Comments on: Hudson + EC2 + Windmill = Cloud Testing http://www.adamchristian.com/archives/269 Fri, 11 Nov 2011 05:47:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Considering in-house web automation? | Adam Christian http://www.adamchristian.com/archives/269#comment-6244 Considering in-house web automation? | Adam Christian Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:38:46 +0000 http://adamchristian.com/?p=269#comment-6244 [...] having someone else manage the infrastructure and avoid those pesky licensing costs. However in my experience the setup is painful, the solutions (EC2, etc.) are slow and lacking some of the features to really [...] [...] having someone else manage the infrastructure and avoid those pesky licensing costs. However in my experience the setup is painful, the solutions (EC2, etc.) are slow and lacking some of the features to really [...]

]]> By: adam http://www.adamchristian.com/archives/269#comment-2034 adam Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:54:16 +0000 http://adamchristian.com/?p=269#comment-2034 So what I wound up doing was creating a label, and assigning all the slaves I want to run tests on to that label. Now each job is tied to that label, and I can run all my tests at once and they distribute the tests across the different machines in the label to run them much faster. Hudson also has a concurrent builds branch which is getting more stable all the time designed to allow you to queue many of the same job and let them run concurrently on the machines in your label. #windmill or #hudson on freenode if you have questions! So what I wound up doing was creating a label, and assigning all the slaves I want to run tests on to that label. Now each job is tied to that label, and I can run all my tests at once and they distribute the tests across the different machines in the label to run them much faster. Hudson also has a concurrent builds branch which is getting more stable all the time designed to allow you to queue many of the same job and let them run concurrently on the machines in your label. #windmill or #hudson on freenode if you have questions!

]]> By: Guilherme Silveira http://www.adamchristian.com/archives/269#comment-1985 Guilherme Silveira Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:55:52 +0000 http://adamchristian.com/?p=269#comment-1985 Hey there, Great news... we have been implementing our own ci server because we needed multiple jobs to be run in parallel and hudson wasnt providing it so far. What about running different - not the same - job in multiple machines. I would actually require to run a different set of tests in each machine, in order to speed up tests - not actually interested in multiple browser in this situation. Is there anything related to that? Regards Hey there,

Great news… we have been implementing our own ci server because we needed multiple jobs to be run in parallel and hudson wasnt providing it so far. What about running different – not the same – job in multiple machines. I would actually require to run a different set of tests in each machine, in order to speed up tests – not actually interested in multiple browser in this situation. Is there anything related to that?

Regards

]]>